Days to execution: Unknown

As far as I know, 24-year-old Melbourne man Nguyen Tuong Van is still in a cell at Singapore's Changi Prison facing execution. He will be given less than 24 hours notice of his hanging; and we won't be told until it is done. The Australian Government and our media are failing him miserably. After ten months on death row, Nguyen Tuong Van should be a household name.

I remember back when I was eleven years old. I was at a friend's place and like most Australian homes the television was blaring constantly in the background. I vividly remember stopping to watch a report that Kevin Barlow and Brian Chambers had been executed and I remember a horrible feeling as I tried to make sense of what had just happened.

Barlow and Chambers were hanged in Malaysia on July 07, 1986 for the alleged trafficking of 141.9 grams of heroin. Back then, I didn't really know what heroin was, but I knew who Barlow and Chambers were.

The Australian media lapped up the Barlow and Chambers case, using it to sell more and more newspapers and to increase the ratings on their news and current affairs programs. Australia's press gallery went into a frenzy in an attempt to save the men.

For political reasons, this media pressure backfired. Rajendran Kuppusamy, the Malaysian hangman who performed the executions, told the Sydney Daily Telegraph newspaper in 1996 that the case was rushed through the Malaysian legal system.

"The Attorney-General wanted us to make it fast, he didn't want to delay the case," said Kuppusamy. "It was really fast because they were getting pressure from all over."

Facing an election, Malaysian President Dr Mahathir Mohamad was under immense pressure to show that he was the man prepared to stand-up against the West - against White people.

Once the executions had happened the Australian news barons dropped the story as quickly as the two young Australians had dropped through the trapdoor in Pudu Prison.

The journalists returned to their usual mundanereporting and the issue was dead. They might havefailed to prevent the executions, and possibly even contributed to the executions being rushed, but Australia's press gallery had succeeded in imprinting the names Barlow and Chambers firmly in the Australian psyche.

Almost twenty years after the deaths of Barlow and Chambers, Nguyen Tuong Van, on his first trip overseas from Australia, was arrested at Singapore airport. Police alleged that Nguyen was in possession of 400g of heroin. A Singapore court sentenced him to death for this crime in March 2004.

In stark contrast to events in 1986, Nguyen Tuong Van has been virtually ignored by the Australian Government and the media. Michael Fay, the white American kid who damaged a car or two and was flogged by the Singapore Government with the rattan cane, received more attention from the Australian media than this young Aussie from Melbourne. Nguyen Tuong Van is definitely not a household name!

Why are the media ignoring Nguyen? Is it because they can't pronounce his name or is the real reason a little more insidious than that? I mean, Schapelle Corby doesn't exactly roll off the tongue and she has been turned into a media celebrity, not to mention the millionaire Aussie yachtsman Chris Packer, recently released from an Indonesian jail after serving three months for failing to declare firearms.

I don't want to take away from the seriousness of Schapelle's situation. This young woman may also face the death penalty if she is found guilty of her alleged crime. Her trial has even been invaded by an Indonesian anti-drugs group demanding her execution.

With regards to media reporting though, there is obviously some sort of double standard happening.

Brian Chambers, Kevin Barlow, Schapelle Corby and Chris Packer all have one thing in common. They are all white Australians. Nguyen Tuong Van's crime is that he is an Australian of Vietnamese origin. Australia's predominantly white journalists (and our white Prime Minister) have written him off as just another Viet boy dealing smack, just like they write off the residents of the Block in Redfern and Cabramatta in Sydney.

Like Singapore's judiciary, they ignore Nguyen's claims that he was only carrying the drugs in a desperate bid to pay off legal fees owed by his twin brother to a Sydney-based drugs syndicate. During a recent visit to Singapore, Australian Prime Minister John Howard held a meeting with his counterpart Lee Hsien Loong where he put forward a half-hearted request for clemency. Mr Howard told the Melbourne Age; "I believe there's a very good case for clemency but people must understand that the laws of Singapore are well known and I think we'll leave it at that."

Responding to the Age reporters question on whether the execution of Nguyen would have an impact on bilateral relations between the two countries, Howard said: "Look, I think we have to keep a balance here." What he is saying is that Australia's military relationship with Singapore is worth more to us economically than Nguyen Tuong Van. The Republic of Singapore Air Force has aircraft and personnel permanently stationed at the Pearce air force base north of Perth and Singaporean fighter jets and naval vessels are regularly in and out of the Northern Australian city of Darwin.

Australian military personnel provide ongoing training to Singapore's soldiers, sailors and airmen and Australian naval vessels are often in Singapore undergoing repairs that would cost ten times as much back home. Our military alliance and the subsequent boost to the Australian economy is not the only reason Howard is dragging his feet on this case. Singapore isn't in the midst of an election and there doesn't seem to be too much pressure from Singaporeans for Nguyen to be put to death. Sadly it looks like race is a factor in Howard's laissez faire approach to Nguyen's pending execution.

Surely little Johnny wouldn't let a white boy hang so easily? If Nguyen was called Barry and he was from Vaucluse or Sydney's North Shore, Howard would be doing everything in his power to stop the hanging. The Australian Prime Minister is acutely aware that the island nation has executed more than four hundred people since 1991, mostly for drug trafficking, giving Singapore the dubious distinction of having the highest execution rate in the world relative to population.

If Nguyen hangs, Howard will have the dubious distinction of being the Prime Minister who sat by while a young Australian went to the gallows, just like he sat by while 353 asylum seekers drowned in the SievX disaster. Nguyen awaits the results of John Howard's request for clemency. We can only hope and pray that 81-year-old Singaporean President, Sellapan Ramanathan Nathan, will find it in his heart to call off the execution. In the meantime, you might want to contact your localmedia and ask them one question; do they rememberNguyen Tuong Van?

As for Schapelle, we train Indonesia's troops too. This could be a sticky one for the Australian PrimeMinister. Let's just hope that she gets a fair trial and that some sanity prevails in Bali.

Gary Meyerhoff is a freelance journalist and an active member of the Darwin-based drug law-reform group the Network Against Prohibition (https://www.napnt.org).

TONY EASTLEY: The lawyer for a young Australian man facing the hangman's noose in Singapore says his client's best chance of survival lies with the Howard Government.

Melbourne barrister Lex Lasry says his client, Nguyen Tuong Van, faces little hope against what he calls a "grotesque" legal system in Singapore.

The 23-year-old Australian man claimed he tried to smuggle heroin out of Vietnam to pay-off his twin brother's heavy debts.

Nick Grimm reports.

NICK GRIMM: Nguyen Tuong Van is sitting in a prison cell on death row in Singapore's Changi prison. Unless he can mount a successful appeal he faces death by hanging before the year is out.

All this, because he thought he could pay off his twin brother's heavy debts, racked up in legal fees after being charged with affray and drug offences.

But if Nguyen Tuong Van's brother had made mistakes in life, they were nothing compared to the mistake he would make, agreeing to smuggle heroin out of Vietnam to pay off the money his brother owed, a debt he'd decided to take on himself.

Their mother pleaded this weekend for her son's life.

KIM NGUYEN: What happened was a shock to me very much, to have my family, my son is coming home or in jail. Please don't hang him, please.

NICK GRIMM: The 23-year-old former refugee was arrested while in an airport transit lounge in Singapore, a country with a mandatory death penalty for those caught smuggling more than 15 grams of heroin.

Nguyen Tuong Van was carrying 400 grams.

But his lawyer argues he's no hardened criminal.

LEX LASRY: There's no question that our client is a small fish.

NICK GRIMM: Melbourne barrister Lex Lasry.

LEX LASRY: And he's been sentenced to death in circumstances where he's not had an opportunity to say to a court why in this particular case the death sentence is not proportionate to his criminality.

Now, as a matter of human rights law, that to me is simply grotesque.

NICK GRIMM: And in light of that opinion, Lex Lasry rates his clients chances for survival as poor.

LEX LASRY: I mean, the record in Singapore demonstrates that most people are not granted clemency, and so most people who are sentenced to death, indeed by far the majority of people who are sentenced to death, are unfortunately actually executed.

NICK GRIMM: So what are the options facing your client?

LEX LASRY: If he appeals, the appeal may be successful. If the appeal fails, then there'll be an appeal to the Singapore President for clemency, and that's the one that is the one to be concentrated on, I suspect, in the long-term.

NICK GRIMM: Now what do you believe the Australian Government can and should be doing while that process is underway?

LEX LASRY: Well we're keen to have the Australian Government's support, and I must say we've had it so far, and as I understand their position they'll continue to be involved. The position they take is normally one where representations are made by diplomatic means and we're anxious for that to continue.

But we're anxious to have as much in the way of representations and support for our client as we possibly can.

TONY EASTLEY: Melbourne barrister Lex Lasry, speaking there with our reporter, Nick Grimm.